Bernoulli Processes

Flip coins, each of which comes up heads with probability : this is a Bernoulli process (so named because each coin is just a Bernoulli random variable).

Regarding this process, we can ask several interesting questions:

  1. What’s the chance that we get exactly heads?
  2. What’s the chance that the index of the first coin which comes up heads is (one-indexed)?
  3. If is infinite, what is the expected value of (first index w/ heads)?

Currently, events are discrete, since they are in chunks of one coin flip at a time. How can we make them continuous instead?

Poisson Processes

Instead of a process parameterized by , we now use to denote the expected # of successes (heads) within each one-second interval. In other words, the chance of a success in an interval of size is .

First off, what is , the chance that there are no successes at all in a -second interval? Note that

This differential equation is precisely the definition of the exponential function! That is:

What about the chance of one success in a -second interval? Integrating over all possible times for this single success, we get that:

Essentially, we start assuming that all trials failed, then choose one failure to “toggle” to a success. Notice that the denominator vanishes because .

Now, in general, what is , the chance of successes in a -second interval? Applying the same logic, we get that

Another derived random variable to consider is , the time of first success. Note that . From this, we can derive the PDF:

Note that is still , since .

A more interesting problem: what’s ? We can use a similar argument as we did for expected value (taking advantage of the fact that the Poisson process is memoryless) to get that

Rearranging, we get:

Here, we use the fact that since . From here, we can show that

As a direct consequence, .

Now, let be the number of success in a -second interval. Then, we can show that . The fact that is actually very special, since typically mean and variance have different dimensions and thus this equality is highly unlikely. However, is a “counting” variable, which means it’s dimensionless and thus the above expression makes perfect sense.